Home » Featured

Opinion: Jonathan Azaziah on Communism

23 July 2012 13,949 views 23 Comments

Editor’s note
The following analysis was emailed to me by Jonathan Azaziah after I had asked him for his thoughts on Communism. Specifically I asked Jonathan how one can reconcile the notion that Communism is supposed to be an ideology based on altruism and social justice, while, in the case of the Bolshevik Revolution, it has been characterised by tyranny, terrorism, and unspeakable suffering.

by Jonathan Azaziah.

I do not, repeat, do NOT view Communism (Marxism) as a movement and ideology based on social justice by any means. Communism was not birthed by Karl Marx (son of a long line of racist, supremacist Talmudic rabbis) and Friedrich Engels as it is so often said. It is actually the work of the racist, supremacist, maniacal Talmudic rabbi Moses Hess, who also introduced Zionism to the world with his book “Rome and Jerusalem.” Karl Marx called Hess his “red rabbi”, and Hess viewed Communism as a means controlling Gentiles through crypto-Judaic thought and subsequently using their “revolutions” of communist mobilization to usher in an age controlled by Zionism. This is discussed at length in Michael A. Hoffman II’s groundbreaking book “Discovering Judaism”.

Persons of the “communist” or more broadly, the “leftist” persuasion have a difficult time admitting this fact or even looking into it because then their precious dogma would be completely and utterly shattered. More importantly, for all of Marx’s anti-capitalist writings and ravings, is it not impeccably odd that he never once, not even ONCE, criticized the Rothschilds and other Jewish-Zionist banking giants during his time? There is no doubt, thanks to the works of Professor Niall Ferguson known as “House of Rothschild (Volumes 1 and 2)”, which are based on official Rothschild family documents, that this Jewish dynasty controlled the colonial powers at this time through their central banks. A central bank, by the way, is central to Marxism. Again, impeccably odd, no? So again, why no criticism of the greatest plutocratic parasitic capitalists of his era and of his time??

Mikhail Bakunin, the father of anarchism and another hero of the “left” has the answer, although you will NEVER hear leftists bring this up,

This whole Jewish world, comprising a single exploiting sect, a kind of blood sucking people, a kind of organic destructive collective parasite, going beyond not only the frontiers of states, but of political opinion, this world is now, at least for the most part, at the disposal of Marx on the one hand, and of Rothschild on the other… This may seem strange. What can there be in common between socialism and a leading bank? The point is that authoritarian socialism, Marxist communism, demands a strong centralisation of the state. And where there is centralisation of the state, there must necessarily be a central bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, speculating with the Labour of the people, will be found.” Here is a more complete quote, “Marx is a Jew and is surrounded by a crowd of little, more or less intelligent, scheming, agile, speculating Jews, just as Jews are everywhere — commercial and banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades; in short, literary brokers, just as they are financial brokers, with one foot in the bank and the other in the socialist movement, and their arses sitting upon the German press. They have grabbed hold of all newspapers, and you can imagine what a nauseating literature is the outcome of it …. Now this entire Jewish world, which constitutes an exploiting sect, a people of leeches, a voracious parasite, closely and intimately connected with another, regardless not only of frontiers but of political differences as well — this Jewish world is today largely at the disposal of Marx or Rothschild. I am sure that, on the one hand, the Rothschilds appreciate the merits of Marx, and that on the other hand, Marx feels an instinctive inclination and a great respect for the Rothschilds. This may seem strange. What could there be in common between communism and high finance? Ho ho! The communism of Marx seeks a strong state centralization, and where this exists, there the parasitic Jewish nation — which speculates upon the labor of people — will always find the means for its existence …. In reality, this would be for the proletariat a barrack-regime, under which the workingmen and the workingwomen, converted into a uniform mass, would rise, fall asleep, work, and live at the beat of the drum. The privilege of ruling would be in the hands of the skilled and the learned, with a wide scope left for profitable crooked deals carried on by the Jews, who would be attracted by the enormous extension of the international speculations of the national banks.

Truer words on the matter haven’t been spoken.

When this is then reconciled with the Bolshevik Revolution, which was indeed overwhelming Jewish, it all becomes cohesive. The Bolshevik Revolution began with Jews, was controlled by a Jews, was run by Jews, etc. The “revolutionaries”, again, for all their anti-capitalist fervor, actually took money from a Rothschild agent, and one of the greatest capitalists to ever live, Jacob Schiff, whose children intermarried into the Rothschild family. He gave Trotsky and Lenin $20 million to overthrow the Tsar and bragged about it on his death bed. Moreover, it was Schiff who financed Japan during the Russo-Japanese war to the tune of $200 million, facilitating a Japanese victory, the weakening of the Tsarist state and the beginnings of Bolshevik mobilization that would bear fruit a decade later. And this is NOT “anti-Semitic conspiracy theory”, it can be found in the landmark book on Jewish history and the beginnings of the Jewish Lobby in America, “To Free A People” by Gary Dean Best and “The Jewish Century”, an award-winning work on Jewish history by Professor Yuri Slezkine. The Bolshevik security apparatus, the NKVD (or Cheka), was also largely Jewish, and this is further confirmed by “Israeli” author Sever Plocker in his Ynet article “Stalin’s Jews”. The two greatest mass murderers of all-time, Genrikh Yagoda, the father of the Soviet gulag system and Lazar Kagonovich, Stalin’s right hand and perpetrator of the Holodomor in the Ukraine, were Jewish Bolsheviks. Men forgotten by history. Why? Why are the crimes of these men not discussed? Because any criticism of Jews on any level is deemed “anti-Semitic” by this Orwellian society. Even Stalin, a treacherous, gangster-like mass murderer who worked with the Zionist-driven Allied Powers during WW2, was murdered when he stood up to Jewish power in Russia. He was poisoned on Purim. Sound familiar?

In conclusion, Communism, which seeks to centralize the entire planet, making it one gigantic super-state (a one world government, a new world order), and Capitalism (a means of financial unification through international banking {founded by the Rothschilds} and neoliberalism {founded by Milton Friedman}, a one world government, a new world order) are two heads of the same Jewish-Zionist dragon. No matter which one comes to power, it is Jewish interests who come out on top. This isn’t to say every communist or Marxist is an evil, twisted puppet of International Zionism, of course not. Such assertions are moronic, lazy and ignorant. Persons like Castro, Guevara, the great Thomas Sankara of Burkina Faso (murdered by Mossad and CIA), Morales, Correa, Ghassan Kanafani Mossadegh, Allende, etc. were and are good men, obviously. But as a whole, its origins, and as evidenced by the mass murder carried out by the Bolsheviks, Mao, and others allied with these forces, Communism is the greatest killing machine known to man, excluding the imperialism of the United States, which is controlled through the Federal Reserve by the same plutocratic powers that propped up the “revolution” of the Bolsheviks. And therefore, it cannot be relied on to deliver “social justice” to anyone. No conspiracy theory here… just conspiracy fact.

23 Comments »

  • Wally D said:

    I don’t think anyone is under the illusion, anymore that, “Communism is supposed to be an ideology based on altruism and social justice..” Thanks to the internet and the efforts of tireless researchers, the brutal reality of the Bolsheviks is finally becoming understood as Jewish inspired.

  • wad said:

    All truth.

    The way in which Marxism is STILL deceiving the world is astounding.

    Here in Egypt some of the same fighters who fought in the revolution are now championing socialism. Trying to explain this to them results in the most extreme cognitive dissonance.

    There can be no arguing with Marxism, communism or it;s undercover cousin socialism. The only “good socialism” was Germany’s national socialism but it was then just a name. Hitler actually wanted to call the party the Revolutionary Workers party.

    Those good meaning souls who still believe in Communism simply cannot be reasoned with. I have tried. It is an emotional attachment they have that cannot be broken. We must simply overwhelm them with our will power and if necessary utterly humiliate them into sanity.

    This is 1933 all over again. This time WE shall win.

  • Amerikagulag said:

    It’s also instructive to remember that the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia was begun by just under 400 people. 19 of those people were Russians. The rest were Jews and the vast majority of those remaining were from the “east side of New York”.

    Speaks volumes as to why they’ve been kicked out of dozens of countries throughout history (except Egypt). It’s their self-perceived specialness, which they base on a book of lies which THEY wrote, that claims their superiority because ‘their fictitious god’ told them so, in that book, which THEY wrote.

    The torah and the talmud are weapons of mass destruction and their adherents are enemies of humanity.

  • Peter Radon said:

    Excellent summary, Jonathan on this jewish/yiddish creation called “Marxism/Bolshevism/Communism. I often refer to this monster for what it really is “Gentile Pest Control”,… from a jewish perspective, of course. It has brought nothing but misery to human kind, and great wealth and power to the jews. Peter

  • Bob said:

    THE HOLY BABYLONIAN TALMUD?

    The Talmud is Judaism’s holiest book (actually a collection of books). Its authority takes precedence over the Old Testament in Judaism. Evidence of this may be found in the Talmud itself, Erubin 21b (Soncino edition):

    “My son, be more careful in the observance of the words of the Scribes than in the words of the Torah (Old Testament).”

    Jewish scholar Hyam Maccoby, in “Judaism on Trial,” quotes Rabbi Yehiel ben Joseph:

    “Further, without the Talmud, we would not be able to understand passages in the Bible … God has handed this authority to the sages and tradition is a necessity as well as scripture. The Sages also made enactments of their own … anyone who does not study the Talmud cannot understand Scripture.”

    Second century Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai, one of Judaism’s very greatest rabbis and a creator of Kabbalah, sanctioned pedophilia—permitting molestation of baby girls even younger than three! He proclaimed,

    “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and a day is permitted to marry a priest.” 1
    Yebamoth 60b,
    Subsequent rabbis refer to ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia as “halakah,” or binding Jewish law. 2 Yebamoth 60b
    Has Rabbi ben Yohai, child rape advocate, been disowned by modern Jews? Hardly. Today, in ben Yohai’s hometown of Meron, Israel, tens of thousands of orthodox and ultra-orthodox Jews gather annually for days and nights of singing and dancing in his memory.
    References to pedophilia abound in the Talmud. They occupy considerable sections of Treatises Kethuboth and Yebamoth and are enthusiastically endorsed by the Talmud’s definitive legal work, Treatise Sanhedrin.

    The Pharisees Endorsed Child Sex

    The rabbis of the Talmud are notorious for their legal hairsplitting, and quibbling debates. But they share rare agreement about their right to molest three year old girls. In contrast to many hotly debated issues, hardly a hint of dissent rises against the prevailing opinion (expressed in many clear passages) that pedophilia is not only normal but scriptural as well! It’s as if the rabbis have found an exalted truth whose majesty silences debate.
    Because the Talmudic authorities who sanction pedophilia are so renowned, and because pedophilia as “halakah” is so explicitly emphasized, not even the translators of the Soncino edition of the Talmud (1936) dared insert a footnote suggesting the slightest criticism. They only comment: “Marriage, of course, was then at a far earlier age than now.” 3

    In fact, footnote 5 to Sanhedrin 60b rejects the right of a Talmudic rabbi to disagree with ben Yohai’s endorsement of pedophilia:
    “How could they [the rabbis], contrary to the opinion of R. Simeon ben Yohai, which has scriptural support, forbid the marriage of the young proselyte?” 4
    1 Yebamoth 60b, p. 402.
    2 Yebamoth 60b, p. 403.
    3 Sanhedrin 76a.
    4 In Yebamoth 60b, p. 404, Rabbi Zera disagrees that sex with girls under three years and one day should be endorsed as halakah.

    Out of Babylon
    It was in Babylon after the exile under Nebuchadnezzar in 597 BC that Judaism’s leading sages probably began to indulge in pedophilia. Babylon was the staggeringly immoral capitol of the ancient world. For 1600 years, the world’s largest population of Jews flourished within it.
    As an example of their evil, Babylonian priests said a man’s religious duty included regular sex with temple prostitutes. Bestiality was widely tolerated. So Babylonians hardly cared whether a rabbi married a three year old girl.
    But with expulsion of the Jews in the 11th century AD, mostly to western Christian lands, Gentile tolerance of Jewish pedophilia abruptly ended.
    Still, a shocking contradiction lingers: If Jews want to revere the transcendent wisdom and moral guidance of the Pharisees and their Talmud, they must accept the right of their greatest ancient sages to violate children. To this hour, no synod of Judaism has repudiated their vile practice.
    Sex with a “Minor” Permitted
    What exactly did these sages say?
    The Pharisees justified child rape by explaining that a boy of nine years was not a “man” Thus they exempted him from God’s Mosaic Law:
    “You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination” (Leviticus. 18:22)
    One passage in the Talmud gives permission for a woman who molested her young son to marry a high priest. It concludes,

    “All agree that the (sexual) connection of a boy aged nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not.” Sanhedrin 69b 5

    Because a boy under 9 is sexually immature, he can’t “throw guilt” on the active offender, morally or legally. 6

    “…the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act.” 7
    The Talmud also says,

    “A male aged nine years and a day who cohabits with his deceased brother’s wife acquires her (as wife).”8
    Clearly, the Talmud teaches that a woman is permitted to marry and have sex with a nine year old boy.
    5 Sanhedrin 69b.
    6 Sanhedrin 55a.
    7 Footnote 1 to Kethuboth 11b.
    8 Sanhedrin 55b.

    Sex at Three Years and One Day
    In contrast to Simeon ben Yohai’s dictum that sex with a little girl is permitted under the age of three years, the general teaching of the Talmud is that the rabbi must wait until a day after her third birthday. She could be taken in marriage simply by the act of rape.
    R. Joseph said: Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. (Sanhedrin 55b)

    A girl who is three years of age and one day may be betrothed by cohabitation. . . .(. Yebamoth 57b)

    A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabited with her she becomes his. (Sanhedrin. 69a, 69b, also discussed in Yebamoth. 60b)
    It was taught: R. Simeon b. Yohai stated: A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest, for it is said, But all the women children that have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves, and Phineas (who was priest, the footnote says) surely was with them. (Yebamoth. 60b)

    [The Talmud says such three year and a day old girls are] . . . fit for cohabitation. . . But all women children, that have not known man by lying with him, it must be concluded that Scripture speaks of one who is fit for cohabitation. (Footnote to Yebamoth. 60b)
    The example of Phineas, a priest, himself marrying an underage virgin of three years is considered by the Talmud as proof that such infants are “fit for cohabitation.”

    The Talmud teaches that an adult woman’s molestation of a nine year old boy is “not a sexual act” and cannot “throw guilt” upon her because the little boy is not truly a “man.” 9 But they use opposite logic to sanction rape of little girls aged three years and one day: Such infants they count as “women,” sexually mature and fully responsible to comply with the requirements of marriage.
    The Talmud footnotes 3 and 4 to Sanhedrin 55a clearly tell us when the rabbis considered a boy and girl sexually mature and thus ready for marriage. “At nine years a male attains sexual matureness… The sexual matureness of woman is reached at the age of three.”
    9 Sanhedrin 55a.

    No Rights for Child Victims
    The Pharisees were hardly ignorant of the trauma felt by molested children. To complicate redress, the Talmud says a rape victim must wait until she was of age before there would be any possibility of restitution. She must prove that she lived and would live as a devoted Jewess, and she must protest the loss of her virginity on the very hour she comes of age. “As soon as she was of age one hour and did not protest she cannot protest any more.” 10
    The Talmud defends these strict measures as necessary to forestall the possibility of a Gentile child bride rebelling against Judaism and spending the damages awarded to her as a heathen – an unthinkable blasphemy! But the rights of the little girl were really of no great consequence, for,
    “When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (three years and a day) it is as if one put the finger into the eye.” The footnote says that as “tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.” Kethuboth 11b.

    In most cases, the Talmud affirms the innocence of male and female victims of pedophilia. Defenders of the Talmud claim this proves the Talmud’s amazing moral advancement and benevolence toward children; they say it contrasts favorably with “primitive” societies where the child would have been stoned along with the adult perpetrator.

    Actually, the rabbis, from self-protection, were intent on proving the innocence of both parties involved in pedophilia: the child, but more importantly, the pedophile. They stripped a little boy of his right to “throw guilt” on his assailant and demanded complicity in sex from a little girl. By thus providing no significant moral or legal recourse for the child, the Talmud clearly reveals whose side it is on: the raping rabbi.
    Pedophilia Widespread
    Child rape was practiced in the highest circles of Judaism. This is illustrated from Yebamoth. 60b:
    There was a certain town in the land of Israel the legitimacy of whose inhabitants was disputed, and Rabbi sent R. Romanos who conducted an inquiry and found in it the daughter of a proselyte who was under the age of three years and one day, and Rabbi declared her eligible to live with a priest.
    The footnote says that she was “married to a priest” and the rabbi simply permitted her to live with her husband, thus upholding “halakah” as well as the dictum of Simeon ben Yohai,

    “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest.” 12
    These child brides were expected to submit willingly to sex. Yebamoth. 12b confirms that under eleven years and one day a little girl is not permitted to use a contraceptive but “must carry on her marital intercourse in the usual manner.”
    In Sanhedrin 76b a blessing is given to the man who marries off his children before they reach the age of puberty, with a contrasting curse on anyone who waits longer. In fact, failure to have married off one’s daughter by the time she is 12-1/2, the Talmud says, is as bad as one who “returns a lost article to a Cuthean” (Gentile) – a deed for which “the Lord will not spare him.” 13 This passage says:
    “… it is meritorious to marry off one’s children whilst minors.”
    The mind reels at the damage to the untold numbers of girls who were sexually abused within Judaism during the heyday of pedophilia. Such child abuse, definitely practiced in the second century, continued, at least in Babylon, for another 900 years.
    10 Kethuboth 11a.
    11 Kethuboth 11b.
    12 Yebamoth 60b.
    13 Sanhedrin 76b.

    A Fascination with Sex
    Perusing the Talmud, one is overwhelmed with the recurrent preoccupation with sex, especially by the most eminent rabbis. Dozens of illustrations could be presented to illustrate the delight of the Pharisees to discuss sex and quibble over its minutest details.
    The rabbis endorsing child sex undoubtedly practiced what they preached. Yet to this hour, their words are revered. Simeon ben Yohai is honored by Orthodox Jews as one of the very greatest sages and spiritual lights the world has ever known. A member of the earliest “Tannaim,” rabbis most influential in creating the Talmud, he carries more authority to observant Jews than Moses.
    Today, the Talmud’s outspoken pedophiles and child-rape advocates would doubtlessly spend hard time in prison for child molestation.
    The Oedipus complex was the invention of Sigmund Freud! Freud originally discovered, in the treatments partially conducted under hypnosis, that all his patients, both male and female, had been abused children and recounted their histories in the language of symptoms. After reporting his discovery in psychiatric circles, he found himself completely shunned because none of his fellow psychiatrists was prepared to share the findings with him. Freud could not bear the isolation for long. A few months later, in 1897, he described his patients’ reports on sexual abuse as sheer fantasies attributable to their instinctual wishes.

    Freud’s father was a paedophile! In a letter to his friend Wilhelm Fliess, he wrote:
    “Unfortunately, my own father was one of these perverts and is responsible for the hysteria of my brother (all of whose symptoms are identifications) and those of several younger sisters. The frequency of this circumstance often makes me wonder.”
    Fliess’s son, Robert Fliess exposed his own father as being another paedophile, who had sexually abused him when he was a child.

  • M. Clifford said:

    If it’s Socialist to support taxpayers money to create nationalised utilities and services – as opposed to privatising the same and selling them off to fat cats in the City – then I’m a Socialist,

    If it’s Socialist to support a truthful media and a high quality free education – as opposed to a corrupt media that pumps out corporate and warring propaganda and having a dumbed down education only for the rich – then I’m a Socialist.

    The comments published above are completely bogus. Socialism is based upon many philosophers, not just Marx, and I dispute much of what you have written about Marx anyway.

  • siljan said:

    M. Clifford; well said, I agree wholeheartedly.

    Jesus Christ was a socialist.

  • wad said:

    JESUS WAS A NATIONAL SOCIALIST !

    NOT a socialist!!!

    The difference is NIGHT and day. Socialism is a shade of communism as it’s technical meaning is no longer relevant such a hideous mutated tainted strain of evil it has become. Simply do not use the word least you fall into the enemys trap.

    Germany and Libya had the right idea and what you are thinking about but it was NOT SOCIALISM, not in practice nor ideal, for the ideals set forth by Marx were just illusion to capture intelligent minds with good hearts.

    See with your spiritual mind

  • Bob said:

    Communism is INTERNATIONAL Socialism.

    Nazism & Zionism is NATIONAL Socialism.

    ALL need a CENTRAL BANK!

    And that is where the Jew comes in!

  • wad said:

    bob,

    nothing is wrong with a central bank. every nation needs one. it must be controlled by the people and issue interest free currency as needed, not controlled by jewish satanic bankers.

    hitler nationalized their central bank and issued new currency backed by the good faith of the people and not by gold or silver controlled by the rothchilds. worked very well, just as it did in the original 13 colonies with colonial script.

    stop the bs about germany, we know the truth

  • Jonathan said:

    This is crazy talk. It is very tempting for people who are of the collectivist leaning (an already lazy disposition) to group whole peoples of faith together.

    Following the ridiculous quote from Mikhail Bakunin, I was really expecting the author of this post to direct readers to exercise caution about lumping all Jews into the same demonic category. Instead, he says this:

    “Truer words on the matter haven’t been spoken.”

    Should not our focus be on breaking the legality of banking cartels? Not on destroying a certain group of people?

    Of course, if we surrender ourselves to any collective body and invite people to lord it over us, do you think that jew or gentile will treat you any different in the long run? If we are all so personally wolf like and messed up, how is it that submitting to the collective wolvery would solve our problems? People are self-interested: Me, you, everyone you have ever met, everyone who has ever existed. This is axiomatic. I cant put your well being before my own. Please dont hate me for that, just don’t give me any power over you.

    Blaming people is easy, being rational takes a bit more discipline than this.

  • wad said:

    Johnathan,

    You are wrong.

    I used to beleive what you believe and think all this anti jew talk was simply “not accepting personal responsibility” etc..

    After learning what Judiasm truly is I now know better.

    Judiasm is a supremacist virus and to who it infects is utterly mutuates into an inhuman satanic beast. Sounds like wild tabloid style much but every word is true.

    Study Micheal Hoffmans work Judiasm discovered and relearn your history.

    NOTHING will happen unless this virus is forcibly removed from every sector of the planet. Believe that.

  • Jonathan said:

    Do we have the right to exterminate anyone with evil inclinations?

  • wad said:

    Johnathan:

    It it is now clear you are a zionist troll out to entrap.

    Please crawl back into your hole and get some new tricks.

    The world shall speak the truth more and more and then the Jews shall be showered with PURE LOVE, the LOVE they have been begging for for centuries.

    No more raping our mothers, enslaving our sisters and killing our men.

    LOVE is the answer and then the violence and murder shall stop.

    hope ur ready for the LOVE

  • wad said:

    Note to all reading, my last 2 replies to “Johnathan” are for the zionost troll Johnathan, not the brilliant author of this article.

    These zionist trolls use all kinds of tricks even using the authors name to cause confusion.

    They are PAID by the state department and NSA, an army of them.

    Call them out and LAUGH.

  • Jonathan said:

    Jonathan is my real name. Im a libertarian as well. I just dont get down with statements like this:

    “NOTHING will happen unless this virus is forcibly removed from every sector of the planet. Believe that.”

  • Jonathan said:

    Im not even trying to troll. Im not a jew nor am I a zionist. I just that we should apply our analysis of current events logically and consistently. The central bank is the problem, not the ethnicity of much of the central bankers.

  • Bob said:

    “stop the bs about germany, we know the truth.”

    Only the ZIONIST JEWS know about NAZI GERMANY, because they CREATED IT & DESTROYED IT & then BUILT Germany again & are SCREWING the German people ever since.

    The Talmudic Jew CREATED Hitler & Nazism to be the PRIESTS OF MOLOCH to offer up the HOLOCAUST to Moloch/Satan, so as to be able:

    (1)Get rid of millions of Jews they didn’t want going to Palestine & destroying their Rothschild Experiment. They didn’t want the OLD, the SICK & the very YOUNG. They must be destroyed!

    (2)To be able to destroy the German people & become a FINANCIAL PARASITE on the German people after the war.

    The stupid Americans, (Christian Zionists), are willing HOSTS to the ZIONIST PARASITE.

    THE TRUTH ABOUT THE JEWISH BLOOD LIBEL

    Shalom,

    In Exodus 32:7-14 the God of Israel tells Moses to go down from the mountain because He wants to wipe the Israelites off the face of the earth & start with a new people. Moses argues with God & slaughters 3,000 of the Israelites (see Exodus 32:21-28) Why? Because they had offered their children as Human Sacrifices to Moloch & continued to do so right through the Bible, even Solomon offered Human Sacrifices to Moloch. The prophet Amos chapter 5 tells us this; see verse 25-27& Acts 7:42-43.

    To see what happened we have to study Book of Jeremiah, especially chapter 7. Look at verses 21-27. It is clear that Judaism is corrupt from the beginning & we see that in Exodus 18 it’s the Pagan Priest of Median who is organizing Moses not God. The True religion of God is that of God’s Prophets.

    Talmudic Judaism has come down through the centuries pretending to be God’s Chosen People, but as Jesus says in John 8:44-47, they are the children of the devil. Jesus warned His followers to, “Beware the leaven (teachings) of the Pharisees”, which we have in English today called the Babylonian Talmud. In it you will read how Talmudic Jews are to offer Human Sacrifices:

    MISHNAH. HE WHO GIVES OF HIS SEED TO MOLECH INCURS NO PUNISHMENT UNLESS HE DELIVERS IT TO MOLECH AND CAUSES IT TO PASS THROUGH THE FIRE. IF HE GAVE IT TO MOLECH BUT DID NOT CAUSE IT TO PASS THROUGH THE FIRE, OR THE REVERSE, HE INCURS NO PENALTY, UNLESS HE DOES BOTH.

    Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 64a
    Soncino 1961 Edition, page 437

    Following the Mishnah is a discussion among the sages. One of the Talmud Sages, Rabbi Ashi, comments as follows:

    GEMARA. R. Ashi propounded: What if one caused his blind or sleeping son to pass through, (3) or if he caused his grandson by his son or daughter to pass through? — One at least of these you may solve. For it has been taught: [Any men … that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall he put to death … And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people;] because he hath given of his seed unto Molech. Why is this stated? — Because it is said, there shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire. From this I know it only of his son or daughter. Whence do I know that it applies to his son’s son or daughter’s son too? From the verse, [And if the people of the land do any ways hide their eyes from the man] when he giveth of his seed unto Molech [and kill him not: Then I will … cut him off.]

    — Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 64b
    Soncino 1961 Edition, page 439

    If YHWH was REALLY talking to Moshe, then He was the FIRST anti-Semite!

    Exodus 32:7-10

    7 At the same time, the LORD said to Moses, “Go down from this mountain. Your people, the people you brought out of the land of Egypt, have committed a terrible sin. 8 They have very quickly turned away from what I commanded them to do. They made a calf from melted gold for themselves. They are worshiping that calf and making HUMAN sacrifices to it. The people have said, ‘Israel, these are the gods that led you out of Egypt.’”
    9 The LORD said to Moses, “I have seen these people, and I know that they are very stubborn. They will always turn against me. 10 So now let me DESTROY THEM in anger. Then I will make a great nation from you.”

  • Mr. Know-Nothing said:

    In my opinion, the biggest enemy of the planners of the New World Order is socialism. And their greatest fear is that the common people of the United States will band together and demand an end to being ruled by big money. So what is the alternative to being rules by big money? It’s having the state owning the central bank, for a start. In other words, their greatest fear is of a mass political movement that is at least sympathetic to some aspects of socialism. If you understand this then everything becomes clearer.

    Then there is the rising sentiment among many people of opposition to Zionism and to Jewish financial and political power, which is clearly a part of the push for a New World Order. I think that’s a positive thing but I’m growing suspicious of the number of American websites that diverge from this to a general anti-socialist slant. Yes, I admit that that this is not so new – writings that do this have been in existence for many decades. In other words, I believe the literature and the websites that point out the convergence of Jewish financial/political power and Bolshevism have been, and are being used as PROPAGANDA VEHICLES to attack socialism in general.

    Take the example of Mao Zedong. How many times have you read the description of him as a “mass murderer” on anti-Zionist websites? As far as I can see, this is Cold War propaganda. There is no evidence that he killed millions of his own people. Yes, several million Chinese died due to famines in the 1950’s and 60’s but that is not mass murder. China had been experiencing periodic famines for hundreds of years before Mao and it is unrealistic to expect things to have changed overnight under the Communists. This was especially true when they had to divert so much of their resources to military readiness because of the constant threat of military attack by the U.S. and when the Chinese were subjected to severe international financial and trade restrictions by the West.

    I’m disappointed that Jonathon Azaziah has fallen for this propaganda and is further propagating it.

  • Mr. Know-Nothing said:

    I forgot to mention this: “United you stand, divided you fall.” If you have such a disdain for “collectivism” then you will never collect yourselves together – you will forever be divided.

  • Bob said:

    YO JACOB ISRAEL WAD,

    FEEL THE LOVE!

    Matthew 15
    King James Version (KJV)
    1 Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees (Talmudic Jews), which were of Jerusalem, saying,

    2 Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders (The Talmud)? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread.

    3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?

    4 For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.

    5 But ye say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, It is a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me;

    6 And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.

    7 Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying,

    8 This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.

    9 But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.

    10 And he called the multitude, and said unto them, Hear, and understand:

    11 Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.

    12 Then came his disciples, and said unto him, Knowest thou that the Pharisees were offended, after they heard this saying?

    13 But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up.

    14 Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.

    15 Then answered Peter and said unto him, Declare unto us this parable.

    16 And Jesus said, Are ye also yet without understanding?

    17 Do not ye yet understand, that whatsoever entereth in at the mouth goeth into the belly, and is cast out into the draught?

    18 But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man.

    19 For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies:

    20 These are the things which defile a man: but to eat with unwashen hands defileth not a man.

    John 8:43-47
    King James Version (KJV)

    43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.

    44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

    45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

    46 Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me?

    47 He that is of God heareth God’s words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.

  • BRoI said:

    “More importantly, for all of Marx’s anti-capitalist writings and ravings, is it not impeccably odd that he never once, not even ONCE, criticized the Rothschilds and other Jewish-Zionist banking giants during his time?”

    “This Jew organization of loan-mongers is as dangerous to the people as the aristocratic organization of landowners. It principally sprang up in Europe since Rothschild was made a Baron by Austria, enriched by the money earned by the Hessians in fighting the American Revolution.”

    “The loan-mongering Jews of Europe do only on a larger and more obnoxious scale what many others do on one smaller and less significant. But it is only because the Jews are so strong that it is timely and expedient to expose and stigmatize their organization.”

    — Karl Marx, 1856

    http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/marx-rages-against-free-masonry-of-jews.html

  • Deadbeat said:

    Question whether Marx wrote the piece …

    The following article which appeared in the January 4, 1856 edition of the New York Daily Tribune, isn’t credited to Karl Marx, but it does appear in a collection of his articles published in 1897 by his daughter Eleanor.

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Show us you\'re human! *